Thanks for the links Roy. I'll definitely check them
out.
Cool, this is one of the first times I've seen TypeMock
in action and I can definitely think of some situations
where it would be useful when you are dealing with an
existing code-base that wasn't built with testability in
mind. Especially to enable untestable code to be more
safely refactored.
Thanks Roy!
Cool video. I've been intending to review TypeMock for a
while and this is a nice jumpstart.
hey thanks for the video
From the example the dependency on Config and Logger is
not broken at all, all i saw from the example was how
you can use Typemock to side step this tight coupling
between the ActionHandler and Logger and ActionHandler
and Config, to make your tests pass.
Nice video, Roy. I'm left with two questions:
1. After running each test, some kind of panel pops up
that appears to let you navigate tabs using the keyboard
only. No mouse. Is this yet another R# feature?
2. I would like to hear more about which of the features
you've demonstrated are available in which version of
TypeMock. Obviously, I'm looking to see how far the
Community Edition will take me.
flipdoubt :
The panel I suspect you're seeing is me pressing
Ctrl-Tab. If not, I'm also double clicking on the stack
output lines in the output window (the ones that have
(line,column) strings like (10,0).
this is a feature of visual studio.
Also, the community edition will only let you write
reflective mocks (the ones with strings). Natural mocks
are only available in the pro and enterprise edition.
Here's a feature comparison list:
http://www.typemock.com/Features.html
Are you going to include typemock best preactices more
in your unit testing. I already have subscribed for the
book and in the early releases it looks like you have
not mentioned much about typemock best practices.