Contents tagged with .NET 3.5
-
So I Created Another Utils Library
Thought it was time I start my own Utils library (why not everyone else seems to have one), I have things like a UnitOfWork implementation, base Repository class, and plan to add more things as I go.
This is still a work in progress and I would appreciate any feedback out there, in the meantime I will continue my work on it.
You can find the project on GitHub @ http://github.com/stefansedich/YetAnotherUtilsLib
Cheers
Stefan -
In Memory SQLite + Unit Test + FluentNHibernate
UPDATE:
I have forked fluent NH here: http://github.com/stefansedich/fluent-nhibernate, and added a change so we can just use:
.Database(SQLiteConfiguration.Standard.InMemory().ShowSql())
By default the InMemory() helper will now add the pooling support, I sent a push request, so hopefully this hits trunk. Not sure if I was being silly but I do not see a need where you would not pool in memory SQLite anyway.
----------------------------------------------------------
Just playing around with FNH for the first time, getting my unit tests running proved to be a pain, did a Google and had no luck finding a solution to my problem.
A quick play using the fluent config I found a way to get it working, my full session factory setup is below:
public ISessionFactory GetSessionFactory() { return Fluently.Configure() .Database(SQLiteConfiguration.Standard.InMemory() .ConnectionString("Data Source=:memory:;Version=3;New=True;Pooling=True;Max Pool Size=1;")) .Mappings(m => m.FluentMappings.AddFromAssembly(typeof(CustomerRepository).Assembly)) .ExposeConfiguration(config => new SchemaExport(config).Create(true, true)) .BuildSessionFactory(); }
The key was to set the Pooling=True;Max PoolSize=1; in my config, looking at fluent NH the .InMemory() shortcut seems to not set these:
public SQLiteConfiguration InMemory() { Raw("connection.release_mode", "on_close"); return ConnectionString(c => c .Is("Data Source=:memory:;Version=3;New=True;")); }
Guess it would be great if it did, but for the time being I will just do it manually.
Cheers
Stefan -
NHibernate Session Management using FluentNhibernate and Castle Windsor
Time for my first post in a while, thought I would post on session management using Castle Windsor.
I found this good post, http://blog.stevehorn.cc/2009/03/fluent-nhibernate-configured-via.html and I have basically converted it to use Castle for IoC instead.
The Windsor config that will work is below:
var container = new WindsorContainer();
container.AddFacility(); // This adds support to be able to use the UsingFactoryMethod.
container.Register(Component.For().ImplementedBy ().LifeStyle.Singleton);
container.Register(Component.For().UsingFactoryMethod(x => x.Resolve () .GetSessionFactory() .OpenSession()).LifeStyle.PerWebRequest);
The only other addition that is needed for Windsor is to add the PerWebRequest module to your Web.config file in the httpModules section:
<add name="PerRequestLifestyle" type="Castle.MicroKernel.Lifestyle.PerWebRequestLifestyleModule, Castle.MicroKernel" />
And you are done, nice and simple NHibernate Session management using a Windsor container.
Cheers Stefan -
Long time no post, here is something for fun, any object to a dictionary using an extension method!
Long time no post again :(, I will be getting back into it very soon if I can :).
-
Lazy Loaded One-To-One With NHibernate
UPDATE 20081114
The one-to-one solution I had posted turned out not to work for updates, :(, in the end I had to use a many-to-one map with a unique foreign key association to get this to work, the updated example is below. Sorry for my EPIC FAIL :)... -
Day Of Frustration
<Rant>
-
Avoid Memory Leaks When Using Windsor And Not Releasing Objects
I just had this issue in a project I am working on (ASP.NET Webforms Application), yesterday I ran a load test and watched my memory climb rapidly and max out not long after. I am using Castle Windsor for my IOC and mostly transient instances are registered so I did not expect any issues here as I asssumed there would be no references held to my transient instances but the leak shows this is happening.
I am not releasing my services once done so this is partly my fault but I do not wan't to explicitly release them so I found another way which means setting the ReleasePolicy on the kernel to use the NoTrackingReleasePolicy. The default release policy is the AllComponentsReleasePolicy which from what I can see by debugging will keep track of your instances and you will need to release them manually when you are finished with the item. -
Bug with Latest Google Chrome and ASP.NET Validation
Hello,
-
Extension Method Competition
I plan on holding an extension method competition, basically the idea is that you submit your favourite most useful/elegant/sexy extension method and these will be judged by a selection of judges (to be picked) and there will also be some form of reward for the winner.
-
Enhanced Validation Control Which Provides Adding Multiple Validation Rules + NHibernate.Validator Support
Hello,