Roland Weigelt

Born to Code

News

  • Twitter: English | Deutsch
  • Meet me:
    .NET Open Space vom 17.10. bis 18.10.2009 in Leipzig
  • GhostDoc:
  • .NET User Group:
  • Personal homepage:
  • XING:
    XING

.NET related Links

Intellisense (Wouldn't it be cool, part 2)

Everytime I use intellisense on a class with a lot of members (e.g. a class derived from System.Windows.Forms.Form) I get overwhelmed by the huge dropdown list if I'm looking for a member I don't know the exact name of.

So wouldn't it be cool if instead of this...

... VS.Net 200x would offer something like this:

Hiding inherited members...

...or showing only certain kinds of members (e.g. only events)...

...would be really nice features (and of course something like this is still on my wish list).

Comments

Sigurdur G. Gunnarsson said:

That's a VERY cool idea! :) I certainly would use this feature.
# August 20, 2003 9:04 AM

Tobias Luetke said:

Visual Assist actually does that, just not with a pretty UI like this :)
# August 20, 2003 11:48 AM

Roland Weigelt said:

Visual Assist: Most of the information on the company website seems to be related to C++ (where VA seems to rock, no doubt). I didn't try the demo because I currently don't have a beta/demo system set up to try new stuff on. And at 79$ per license I must admit that I'm not really excited... but who knows, maybe the demo will convince me....
# August 20, 2003 5:32 PM

Joe Pizzi said:

If you program in C++, yes, the demo will convince you. Also, this product is done well enough that you don't really have to have another system to try it. Easy to remove if (heaven forbid!!) you don't like it.

At $79 per license, it is a steal!!
# August 20, 2003 9:19 PM

TrackBack said:


UnknownReference
# August 21, 2003 7:14 AM

TrackBack said:

# January 8, 2004 6:44 AM

TrackBack said:

# April 5, 2004 2:23 PM

TrackBack said:

# June 22, 2004 8:37 PM

TrackBack said:

# June 22, 2004 8:51 PM

Stephen H. said:

excellent.
# June 26, 2004 12:52 PM

TrackBack said:

# December 9, 2004 10:58 PM

TrackBack said:

# December 9, 2004 10:58 PM

TrackBack said:

# January 23, 2005 9:41 AM

TrackBack said:

# March 17, 2005 12:39 PM